Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H2i technologies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Userfied - non-admin close. ukexpat (talk) 19:43, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- H2i technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Company fails WP:GNG as there is no significant coverage in WP:RS. For sources that are available, they are listings and passing mentions, company fails WP:CORPDEPTH. FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 14:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. czar · · 14:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. czar · · 14:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. czar · · 14:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy - user has requested userfication at OTRS, ticket # 2013050610007761.--ukexpat (talk) 16:11, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw - I have no objection to userfying the piece. I will keep tabs on it along with variations of the name to make sure when it comes back it contains the WP:RS needed to support notability. Thanks.--FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 19:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.