Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gutterflycomix
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:41, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Gutterflycomix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A former webcomic hosting service that doesn't appear to have ever had any notability. The article itself is completely unsourced, and searching for sources on my own gave me nothing usable. The only information I'm finding are either copies of this Wiki article, forum posts by one of the site's founders on various message boards, and press releases. I have yet to find any substantial, reliable source that discusses this site. Rorshacma (talk) 21:36, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:05, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:05, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:05, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Not notable. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 15:00, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gongshow Talk 06:54, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.