Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GuiasLocal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GuiasLocal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod was contested in November 2009 and I decided to give it some time to see what came of this article. Fails WP:N and WP:CORP I have been unable to find sufficient reliable 3rd party coverage that would allow it to pass either. -- RP459 ^Talk/_{Contributions} 22:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A startup with no independent coverage that I could find. A Google News search was interesting as all the mentions I could find were actually comment spam attached to articles. -- Whpq (talk) 21:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:32, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No reliable sources. Just press releases. Falls well below notability standards. --Mkativerata (talk) 23:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.