Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gue'vesa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed as Redirect. Bold Non-admin closure. Content is already merged by DataSnake and the parent article is obvious. Protonk (talk) 19:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gue'vesa

Non-notable concept from a fictional universe. Written almost entirely in a in-universe style that has not been changed since the article's creation in 2006. No coverage (let alone substantial coverage) of this subject in third-party sources (i.e., works not published by the game's publisher) is either cited or likely. Sandstein 20:49, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into a suitable article. This should be the default way to deal with these, and it does not take AfD. DGG (talk) 17:34, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dictdef for a fictional language. There's not a lot more to say here, even if we used primary sources only. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 20:11, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Plot summary and in-universe detail with no real-world information. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject indicates that this topic is non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a game guide and it is not a collection of indiscriminate plot detail. I am not convinced by the suggestion that mergers must be entertained prior to deletion discussion, mostly because all fictional characters have an obvious parent article (almost by definition). Protonk (talk) 19:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note I have merged this into the main Tau article. I suggest a redirect. -- DataSnake _{my talk} 15:16, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.