Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group 90

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I think the additional sources are sufficient to show notability ; some editing is needed for conciseness, & I've begun it. DGG ( talk ) 05:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Group 90

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ad-like, bad tone, sources I found were all tangential. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 17:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – There are book and journal references in the article that establish notability. Of particular significance: nuSense: An exhibition of drawings and paintings of the nude by members of Group 90. Singapore: Procomp Prinset Singapore. ISBN 981-047812-7. Northamerica1000 (talk) 21:33, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article gives references, but I'm unable to find them. With the book, nuSense: An exhibition of drawings and paintings of the nude by members of Group 90, I'm unable to find it via the ISBN number. It says it is printed by "Procomp Prinset Singapore", but the company doesn't deal with books and is a general printing company. Articles lists references by Wai Hon, but Wai Hon is a founding member of the group, so even if I was able to find them, the refs are not independent. I can find refs that say Group 90 was an informal gathering, they organized exhibitions and certain artists belonged to the group. But in the end, unable to find reliable, significant references. Bgwhite (talk) 20:31, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Bgwhite. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Straits Times, a leading newspaper in Singapore, provides two sources. Plus some others. The topic seems fairly substantial. BigJim707 (talk) 03:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has done exhibitions at notable galleries. WP:ARTIST 4b has been met. Dream Focus 03:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.