Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Storage and the Emerald™ Program

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dennis - 2¢ 16:13, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Green Storage and the Emerald™ Program

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination. Article is a contested PROD with the following deletion reasons: "No sources cited, no indication of notability" and "Trademarks are almost never notable, and no evidence exists that this meets WP:GNG." Euryalus (talk) 04:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't see any evidence that this trademarked name is notable, nor is the company that owns it. Please, convince me otherwise. I have no horse in this race. Bearian (talk) 22:42, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.