Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greek key

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, as a disambiguation page. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular ^T · C 18:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greek key

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subsection of main article Beta sheet contains more information than this stub. Giftiger wunsch (talk) 17:41, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand - indisputably notable and sourceable. I'm working on it now. Chutznik (talk) 19:40, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, change my mind - merge into beta sheet. This actually does not require admin intervention. Chutznik (talk) 19:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have executed a merge, and am replacing the article content with disambiguation. In order not to short-circuit the AFD, I'm leaving the original content below the disambig. At the end of 7 days, if consensus supports this action, please leave the disambig and remove the remainder of the page. Chutznik (talk) 20:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support replacement with dab per Chutznik. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Probably preferrable to outright deletion as the original article did include a topology diagram which the Beta sheet article lacked. I support the action taken by Chutznik. -Giftiger wunsch (talk) 09:39, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Beta sheet and redirect to meander (art) (or leave as disambig). --FormerIP (talk) 17:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as disambiguation - Someone removed the disambiguation stuff in good faith, but I reverted. Can we speedy keep this and remove the rest of the article? PDCook (talk) 16:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.