Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Cow BASIC
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Insufficient reliable source coverage to demonstrate notability. ~ mazca talk 00:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Great Cow BASIC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:02, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! Why delete? This is for hobby programmers. There should be article about free open source software for microcontrollers.
- I said why. The article fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No it doesn't, free basic compilers for PIC are not exactly 10 a penny, not sure the arrogant tone is exactly in the spirit of Wikipedia either, heh, anyway, I vote....Hideki (talk) 15:10, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How does it not? Joe Chill (talk) 18:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No it doesn't, free basic compilers for PIC are not exactly 10 a penny, not sure the arrogant tone is exactly in the spirit of Wikipedia either, heh, anyway, I vote....Hideki (talk) 15:10, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I just needed to find information on this language and the page is here, had it not been I'd have been left looking, okay I'm a very small sample but I doubt I'm the only one Hideki (talk) 15:04, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can find no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yawn. WP:BURDEN. There are cases when useful things are too obscure for Wikipedia. Miami33139 (talk) 17:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.