Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grassroots Projects

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grassroots Projects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct, apparently short lived, no indications of notability Mccapra (talk) 13:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Qualitist (talk) 15:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Qualitist (talk) 15:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Does not appear to have coverage in reliable secondary sources per WP:NORG. All sources on page appear primary, and have been claimed by linkrot. Could not find updated versions via googling. Note that it has been tagged as needed additional references since 2007. Few substantive edits have occurred since 2008. Couldn't find any articles, media mentions, or references in general despite trying numerous search booleans (such as "Dutch Grassroots projects Oaxaca", "Dutch Grassroots projects", "Grassroots projects Netherlands") to attempt to get around the fact there are a lot of "grassroots" organizations. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 00:44, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: per Captain Eek. Barely any third-party sources found. GN-z11 17:46, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.