Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphical interface of future operating system
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Since it's so clearly WP:NOT, with zero chance, we should have been able to speedy that. JamieS93 13:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Graphical interface of future operating system (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
personal essay about some fictional GUI, Wikipedia:NOT#ESSAY Amsaim (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Meaningless text, that looks like a school homework. --Privalov (talk) 23:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Essay. Joe Chill (talk) 00:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - absolute, 100% WP:CB. Eddie.willers (talk) 00:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT#ESSAY -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 00:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per the reasoning in my prod tag: "A speculative unsourced essay on what the editor would like to see in future computers. Fails WP:NOT." --Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Absolutely a strong delete!!! What's this really all about? Bigtop 04:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it's a personal essay and as such violates WP:NOT. --BelovedFreak 17:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 17:51, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom, nothing worth keeping.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 08:21, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTALL. Armbrust Talk Contribs 01:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.