Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graph of a square

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:59, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graph of a square

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

How-to formula. delete - UtherSRG (talk) 15:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC) UtherSRG (talk) 15:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, verging on WP:CSD A1/A10 - frankieMR (talk) 16:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obviously. These formula are neither notable nor referenced. Jim.belk (talk) 19:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as A1: no context. —Caesura ^(t) 20:39, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – non-notable original research. The graph of the (unnecessarily complicated) equation given is in general not a square but a constellation of four lines of infinite length enclosing a rectangle. The formulas given for the lower left corner and height and width are simply incorrect (unless a = b = 0). --Lambiam 23:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Very similar recreation of Graphing a square by same author, which was deleted on May 4 (A10: Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic, Square). Non-notable bit of dubious original research -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.