Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GrapesTALK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 20:51, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GrapesTALK

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a nice online magazine, but apparently not notable according to WP:CORP. It's difficult to determine whether it meets WP:SIGCOV, due to ambiguity between search hits for "grape stalk", "grapes talk", and the actual name of the magazine. The only source cited even describes the magazine as an "amateurish newsletter". The article appears to be an attempt at promotion or exposure, having been created by its publisher/editor (creator's username is the same as the publisher). ~Amatulić (talk) 19:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I've been skeptical of the notability of this article for a while but have procrastinated in submitting it for AfD because I was taking a break from deletion debates. It does indeed just look to be a self-promotion vehicle and after 2 years of existence, I have not seen any reliable sources demonstrating mainstream coverage that could be used to improve the article. Agne ^Cheese/^Wine 19:33, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nomination and Agne27, and lack of reliable sources that establish notability. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.