Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gramlee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Gramlee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A grammar correction service written up by user:Gramlee. Is it spam or not? - Sgroupace (talk) 07:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as spam. AlexTiefling (talk) 09:56, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable software doesn't qualify for speedy delete, andthis article at least attempts to be encyclopedic. VG ☎ 19:40, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Meh, this is a web service, so it could be deleted as WP:CSD#A7, but the article does try to assert notability with a couple of reviews, so it's worth debating here. VG ☎ 19:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable, no references. Equendil Talk 12:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 19:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. IMHO, the two reviews provided in the external links section are not from reliable sources. VG ☎ 19:48, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete: blatant advertising by a user with conflict of interest. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 23:29, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.