Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gram per litre
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. can be recreated as a redirect should a suitable title be identified Eddie891 Talk Work 16:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gram per litre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The bundled deletion discussion got out of hand, so let's try again with the individual units which are clearly not notable. There is no evidence for notability for this composite unit. While it is numerically equivalent to the SI composite base unit of density, kg/m^3, that does not make it itself worthy of an entry. That would require secondary coverage of the unit, not simply evidence that it is used. PianoDan (talk) 07:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Alternatively, create Units of density and redirect there. Dondervogel 2 (talk) 11:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - superfluous splitting-up of subunits. This can only serve to confuse. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:49, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.