Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gough Engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gough Engineering

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam which fails WP:NCORP. Cabayi (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:26, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I’ve looked for reliable independent sources and not found them. Mccapra (talk) 22:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Easy delete, entirely unsourced and promotional. SWL36 (talk) 22:48, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find anything beyond press releases and directory entries - nothing that would satisfy CORPDEPTH. Looking at the article's history, a lot of copyvio was removed, and it's been maintained by an editor blocked for socking and undisclosed paid editing - looks like spam. GirthSummit _(blether) 17:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Independent sources WP:ORGIND and advertising and promotion WP:ADPROMO AmericanAgent (talk) 10:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.