Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gotta delete em all! (2nd Nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY KEEP as disruptive nomination. No valid deletion rationale presented, no tagging of articles has occurred. postdlf (talk) 18:17, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon species articles (2nd nomination)

Do we seriously need a list of ALL pokemon species, even ones who are not "rare" or "legendary"?

I propose that all "non legendary" pokemon from the following list be deleted.

Or the very least combine some species. For example, Umbreon, Espeon, Leofeon, Glaceon, Flarion, Vaporion, and all "Evee" evolution lines can be combined with "Eevee"

Non essential Pokemons include but not limited to:

Wikipedia needs to be cleaned up.

Tyw7 (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 18:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close - You obviously have no idea how Wikipedia words. These articles are notable because they have coverage in third party reliable sources. Stop acting so rashly and discuss this so we can tell you why they are notable, and what you are doing is wrong. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 18:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.