Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Googlovic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ivan Gašparovič. MBisanz ^talk 10:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Googlovic

Appears to be a neologism, no evidence of significance of the term; may also be thought of as a pov fork of the Ivan Gašparovič article. Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NPOV. TeaDrinker (talk) 03:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ivan Gašparovič. I did this, but it was undone. It is possibly a viable search term, but on its own, it should be removed. KuroiShiroi (talk) 03:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect. It's a likely search term, but it doesn't warrant an article of its own. It should be included in the article on Gašparovič. —C.Fred (talk) 04:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: Its possible to redirect it with Ivan Gašparovič. South Bay (talk) 04:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I had considered redirecting as well, but I didn't think the term was notable enough for mention in the Gašparovič article (although I know little of Slovak politics) and it seemed unprofessional to use an insulting term as an (uncommented) redirect; a bit like redirecting TOTUS to Obama in my opinion. --TeaDrinker (talk) 04:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think it should be redirected to the presidents name because it is not notable enough. However, if someone comes around the term Googlovic he or she should be able to find in an encyclopedia like this what it means (and that it refers to the Slovak incumbent president). In the internet forums on politics we often speak of Googlovic did this or that, so in my opinion people should be able to find the term in an encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueray1978 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- - Just do a google search on Googlovic and it comes up with several entries Ivan Googlvic, or Googlovic. So if someone reads it and looks in wikipedia for Googlovic, he should be able to find what it means. Redirecting Totus to Obama is same like Googlovic to Gasparovic. I agree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueray1978 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So you still wanna delete, or is the outcome that the article should stay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.127.88.114 (talk) 21:57, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:10, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to his real name. A mention of his nickname in the main article is sufficient, provided that it has reliable sources. Them From Space 01:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think the article should stay. I do not see why not. I vote against redirecting for a simple reason: it would be the same like redirecting Totus to Obama. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.245.195.116 (talk) 11:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.