Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golan Telecom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. However, it would have been helpful if instead of just quoting WP:ORG, some examples of "significant coverage" were provided for review. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Golan Telecom

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable corporation that only started offering its service today (May 14). There are some mentions in news media, but mostly appeared to be trivial mentions. CSD a7 was declined. Syrthiss (talk) 13:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I added two references. The corresponding Hebrew-language article at http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%92%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%9F_%D7%98%D7%9C%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%9D has references that could be added here. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:47, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:47, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology -related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Its will be 5th national cellular provider so its pretty notable--Shrike (talk) 14:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, which is the case for Golan Telecom . Marokwitz (talk) 10:04, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.