Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gog.com
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BJTalk 03:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Gog.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:CORP. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:22, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This company is not yet open for business, so it cannot possibly have any notability. WWGB (talk) 04:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The company is in it's beta stage, and I can verify that it is working. I think that it passes the notability guidelines. The company is part of CD Projekt, and there is an interview [ttp://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3169758 here]. JagDragon♫ (talk) 06:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but fix I'm not enough of a wikipedia-er to know what counts as a legitimate source, but 1up had an interview with GoG. Does that count? http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3169758 I doubt if places like Kotaku are good sources, but a simple google search turned up the 1up thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.16.4.22 (talk) 05:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Add about three WP:RS to demonstrate notablity. We66er (talk) 01:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.