Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/God (Spawn)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

God (Spawn)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alongside the likes of Freak Force this article should be deleted it has no reliable third person sources to demonstrate its notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 12:36, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 3. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 12:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 15:15, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unsourced, no claim to notability, and written entirely from an in-universe perspective. While I have no particularly strong objection a redirect, "God (Spawn)" seem at best a highly unlikely search term. To begin with, "God" is a very generic name, and so even if someone were to be looking for an article on the character, they probably wouldn't expect to find anything under that term. Also, the article lists both Spawn #158 and 163 under "first appearance", which suggests to me that those are the character's only two appearances, so the odds of anyone looking him up are small anyway.--NukeofEarl (talk) 13:27, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 05:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with NukeofEarl above. This is a very unlikely search term. If there were any out-of-universe information, it could be merged to an appropriate "cultural depictions" articles, but there really isn't anything to merge. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.