Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibraltar Community Support Groups
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 20:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Gibraltar Community Support Groups (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Was nommed for speedy however did not see any speedy categories this applied to. Clearly non encylopedic content (it is a directory of services), not what wikipedia is for Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 19:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non encylopedic content, would work much better as a directory of particular services (not what wikipedia is for). Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 19:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I was the editor who originally tagged the article for speedy deletion, I suppose that criteria G11 (blatant advertising) does not apply. In any case, Delete, as the material is unencyclopedic and would be better served as its own website, not as a Wikipedia article. TheLetterM (talk) 19:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Nonencyclopedic and hlaf the article is currently in copyvio. Padillah (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Several of the sites tagged have clear copyright notices. Some do not. Either way, copyright is presumed unless permission is verified. But even if permission were verified, this would remain a directory. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete this might belong on a government of gibraltar web-page under a heading like "community groups"; entirely unencyclopedic.Bali ultimate (talk) 20:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per several comments above, shocked by all the possible copyright infringement. --Knowzilla 14:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.