Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetElementById
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete both. Secret account 05:33, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- GetElementById (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article for a specific javascript function is totally outside the scope of Wikipedia Jimduchek (talk) 15:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Also nominating :GetElementsByClassName (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Jimduchek (talk) 15:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both: not encyclopedic topics. Mundane, directory-style listing/WP:NOTHOWTO. There's nothing interesting here from a historical or computer science point of view. If Wikipedia defined every API for every programming language, where would it end? --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to.... honestly, I'm not sure. Do we have an appropriate list of Javascript functions? Seems like they'd be search terms. But unless they've been discussed and noted on their own merits, I don't know that we can justify articles. Happy to be proved wrong, if someone has a good argument. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 17:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (review) 23:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete METOKNOWONLY (talk) 02:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOTMANUAL DavidTTTaylor (talk) 17:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.