Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetAmped (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 07:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- GetAmped (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Nominated for AfD by User:Paul 1953; I've changed it to point to 2nd nomination. Article suffers from the same problems as before, no notability WP:N, so I also recommend deletion. Marasmusine (talk) 13:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. Marasmusine (talk) 13:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Article seems to suffer from being about an Asia-centric subject that has been little noted in the west. On Commons, we have places to go to request foreign language assistance for certain tasks. Is there a place here to do the same, so we can find out from someone familiar with the languages of the countries in which this game is supposedly popular, about coverage in those countries? Notability doesn't require English-language sources, just sources. Ford MF (talk) 15:56, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The first few pages of Google results are all primary sources. I can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject matter, so as far as I can see it fails WP:N. Una LagunaTalk 16:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Rather then deleting this article, i suggest to move it to other languages.XeonEX (talk) 02:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems like an online mini-game. Y5nthon5a (talk) 04:05, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no significant coverage by reliable verifiable sources independent of the topic. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 22:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.