Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geospatial information officer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – bradv^🍁 02:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Geospatial information officer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Exists, but I couldn't establish that it meets WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 20:47, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect into Geospatial intelligence ~ Shushugah (he/him • talk) 00:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:10, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:11, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete a single job in all the world, apparently, and while it's tempting to redirect the issue I can see is that it could be used somewhere outside the Pentagon to mean someone whose job is more generally geospatial information and not military intelligence per se. Mangoe (talk) 00:51, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are many organisations for which geospatial data is vital – utility companies and the like. And the particular office in the US Army is a role of some importance. We have numerous articles about other lesser roles in the US Army such as Information Assurance Security Officer and so there's no good reason to delete a more important and senior one. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the referenced article, it ought to be deleted as well, and for the same reason. Mangoe (talk) 22:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/redirect Mid-level individual job in one office, without clear broader application or notability for that position. That a utility company has people who use geospatial data is utterly irrelevant to the specific name "Geospatial information officer", and Geospatial intelligence and Geographic data and information speak better to this and workers in this field. Reywas92^Talk 05:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Given that this is one mid-level job in one office in the world, the article is much closer to WP:HOAX then WP:GNG. The article isn't even representative of the topic of working with/using geospatial data. Newshunter12 (talk) 15:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per Newshunter12. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.