Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geomedical engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:56, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Geomedical engineering

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

tagged with COI for a decade; the term was coined in a paper with only two citations since 2009 [1] near neologism to medical geology? fgnievinski (talk) 19:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Environment. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No independent notability. Could be a paragraph in the Medical geology article as "Geomedical Engineer" might be a job description for someone who works on mitigating these issues, but it doesn't stand alone as a separate discipline.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.