Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genius Inside

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP, no consensus to delete. One marginal (but relevant) reference added to article part way through deletion discussion. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 17:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genius Inside

While this says it was a finalist in the IBM Lotus Award, it does not say anywhere else on how it is notable. I see nothing that they made that was outstandingly significant. Soxred93 | talk count bot 02:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, only sources seem to be press releases. -- Renesis (talk) 06:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOT#NOTABLE.-Ravichandar 10:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Updated page content to reference notable 2008 IBM Lotus Mid Market Award. -- Mhankiny (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chetblong^{T C} 12:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Asserts notability by having won a notable award. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 13:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, isn't asserting notability different from satisfying notability requirements? This is enough to keep it from CSD, but no reason to pass AFD, since it doesn't fit the general notability requirements found at WP:N. -- Renesis (talk) 17:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, notability is rendered through being recognized by respected third party as offering outstanding technology and customer benefits. This posting seems in line with like solutions in this space. -- Mhankiny —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.131.169 (talk) 20:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete; no independent coverage or wide public notability. Please note that the "notable award" isn't, really; it's not like the Booker Prize or something, it's just an IBM marketing thing. --MCB (talk) 05:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.