Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generational secret

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Generational secret

Contested prod... I think! Originally prodded as a neologism. An attempt to conflate different vernacular uses of the phrase in order to create a new concept. No references and no relevant ghits beyond everyday usage, nothing to support this as a distinct concept that's in general use. When I prodded it the author vandalised it and left a strange message implying she was done forever with WP. Not quite nonsensical enough for speedying, hence this AfD.

I am also nominating a related page from this author:

It's an unreferenced dictionary definition, now transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has not been expanded beyond a dictionary definition and there's no evidence or assertion of notability (the article even says it's not a term in wide use). Again, when I prodded this the author vandalised it.

andy 09:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both neologism/dictdef. /Blaxthos 14:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice for a different generational secret article. The term is used in counselling, but that's a different use than what appears in this strange article. Capmango 15:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Nom and Capmango -Flubeca^Talk 16:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Save

My dear learned ones. Yes my self deletion had some unusual content. There are items unwritten that you are of the blessed few, not to have experienced. I attended a family reunion last year of which upon introduction, I found my status."Oh I didn't know Claude Derrill had a son". The man mentioned was my father, I at one time was his son. Being "unique" to the point of becoming a Generational secret, made me aware of it's implications and the energy needed with in a family to keep such persons unknown. I suffered through electric shock, chemical shock and solitary confinement for 30 days at a time, just for being different. Now as I am becoming a most wonderful Transformed Woman, I find the need to remain in the shadows, sub notes, whispered entries a total waste of energy I may be speaking from another culture, that is unfamiliar to my judicial board, but am willing to dialog with any and all in my justification. For at one time was not the world considered flat, and all who believed otherwise burnt at the stake? I ask for even a subcategory of unexplored words, even if needed a category of undesirable word notation. I do appreciate being considered unique, if curiosity is of effect please to venture to my space countess_estelle. Thank you for consideration of my entries, and I do wish to have the option of self deletion, if that may be afforded.

Ms. Estelle Irene Kinkade Wilson II

Delete - no reliable sources and no indication it can be extended beyond a dicdef. -- Whpq 14:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete especially the second one as a slightly expanded dicdef. theProject 03:04, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.