Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation R
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted (G12) by Sphilbrick. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 17:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Generation R (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed PROD. Concern was Non-notable research study. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOT#OR ClaretAsh (talk) 11:42, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, this is definitely a notable research study. Unique in its kind and it also has a link with an other Wikipedia article about the Rotterdam study. An other research project conducted in Rotterdam, the Netherlands and known world wide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktoebes (talk • contribs) 12:33, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article's author claims (above) that this is "definitely notable" but I'm finding that hard to confirm. But as it stands the article is a copyright violation anyway; I have tagged the article for speedy deletion accordingly. RichardOSmith (talk) 13:04, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.