Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gecko Gear
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Gecko Gear (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company, no reliable independent sources, most google hits are unrelated or are reviews of their products. Miracle Pen (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 06:44, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 06:44, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - This article contains signficant coverage about the company. But I've not been able to find much more. If more sources can be uncovered, then this would be a keep. -- Whpq (talk) 16:27, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:59, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.