Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GarbleCard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GarbleCard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There just doesn't seem to be enough coverage out there for this to pass WP:GNG. The coverage of the product is from the product's own website. Everything else relates to other associated issues and none of them mention the product. Stalwart111 01:10, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also strongly suspect there is some paid editing involved here given the obvious (to me anyway) links between the creator and company. Stalwart111 01:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC) [reply]
Delete - Endorse nominee, article fails GNG, and it lacks media coverage, the article also seems to be related with paid editing which is strictly against WP:Policies and WP:Guidelines. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 01:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed some content and references which are not meet Wikipedia rules. Is this page still considerd for delation? Yanis ahmed (talk) 05:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because you removed content but didn't add any sources that might allow this subject to meet our inclusion guidelines. Stalwart111 05:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- In this article, every related facts are described and added references to the facts. This is a new security equipment and concerned with the facts discussed in the article. Please consider the facts and KEEP the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eragon.raju (talk • contribs) 06:37, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence that this particular device has attained notability - which is unsurprising as their website indicates they are taking pre-orders and seeking crowdfunding [1]; at best WP:TOOSOON. AllyD (talk) 06:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Another thing - can any Elance users contributing to this debate declare whether they have any WP:COI? AllyD (talk) 06:47, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The RFID skimming article covers this concept, and this particular product appears to be non-GNG. Suggest simply mentioning it in the skimming article with a link to their page. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promotional article per WP:GNG. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.