Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garbage goal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Goal (ice hockey). Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:21, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Garbage goal

Unnotable dictionary definition. Fails WP:NEO and WP:DICDEF, not to mention the fact that it is unreferenced. I watch a lot of hockey and have never heard of this term. Tavix (talk) 23:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per NOT:neologisms.Bsimmons666 (talk) 00:35, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've heard "garbage goal" used to describe a goals on rebounds, etc, but its certainly not worthy of its own article and would be impossible to describe objectively. ccwaters (talk) 15:27, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete like ccwaters mentioned, I've heard it a few times, but it isn't used regularly by any means. Nor is it worthy of its own article, especially with no cites. Black ngold29 18:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was going to suggest merging with Goal (ice hockey), but the term is already defined there. Rklear (talk) 05:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's definately a term that is used frequently in ice hockey, but is better served with a quick blurb in the Goal (ice hockey) article. – Nurmsook! ^talk... 16:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to goal (ice hockey) or just redirect to List of ice hockey terminology. Reso lute 17:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to goal (ice hockey) -Djsasso (talk) 17:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of ice hockey terminology. B.Wind (talk) 02:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.