Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaming Target

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gaming Target

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This website lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) Its only third party links are passing mentions of the website, and there is no sustained, independent coverage with which to write an article. Coverage from other vg sites (from a video game reliable sources custom Google search) also amounted to passing mentions. The article topic does not pass the general notability guideline or any subject-specific guideline. – czar 16:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've managed to find trivial mentions with this search, but significant coverage does not seem to exist. Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - My plethora of searches (different detailed searches at News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found absolutely nothing about this website. SwisterTwister talk 16:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As with the others, I can't find significant coverage in independent sources about the site. Since it was apparently affiliated with UGO Networks, it could probably be redirected there. But I'm not sure that it's really all that useful of a redirect. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:11, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.