Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game-Express

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:02, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Game-Express

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any amount of sources that confirm the claim to notability. Non notable small games aggregation website with no refs, and I just can't find anything. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 01:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 02:11, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 02:11, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of notability. Staszek Lem (talk) 03:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as certainly questionably notable and actually nearly even speedy material. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a non-notable online video game hosting website that fails WP:GNG with no independent, reliable, in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. I cannot locate any reliable source content for this, besides directory entries and generic listings. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 18:15, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. I can't find any coverage of this. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 23:11, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.