Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of mathematical correspondences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be userfied (by someone other than me). Sandstein 08:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery of mathematical correspondences

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not read like an encyclopedic article and possibly contains WP:OR A a s i m 17:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. A a s i m 17:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, also per WP:NOTTEXTBOOK and WP:CFORK; this duplicates existing material at other articles like Function, Cardinality, etc. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think it is a shame that there are only template messages on the article creator's page, and not any human-written messages. --JBL (talk) 18:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I just left a human message on their talk page about what they could possibly do with their article. A a s i m 18:08, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy - it needs more work - I started to link it to other articles - but it's not WP:TNT. If the other editor won't (or can't) work on it, I will do it as a project. Bearian (talk) 16:51, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.