Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G DATA AntiVirus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- G DATA AntiVirus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Similar to SuperAntiSpyware, the software makes no assertion of notability and is nothing more than an advertising vehicle for the company. seicer | talk | contribs 16:30, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't agree. This page just shows an anti-virus product which is mentioned in this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_antivirus_software --Emperordarius (talk) 20:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I wish people stopped building lists of every piece of software ever written and turning every item into a link. Equendil Talk 22:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I don't mind freeware finding its way to Wikipedia all that much, but this is a commercial product, and it is not notable. Equendil Talk 22:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per seicer. No assertion of notability and functions as an advertisement for a commercial product. Enigma message 22:17, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: An encyclopedia should have as much information as possible, especially if the information is correct. But since you have no idea of what an Encyclopedia is, and since the administrators are so stupid to listen to your baby cries, then do what you want and Screw you. [unsigned comment by Emperordarius 03:54, 13 September 2008]
- Comment Emperordarius, that last reply is uncalled-for and does not help your case. Please remain civil if you want to stay in good standing here. JGHowes talk - 22:53, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.