Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GUI-Tester
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- GUI-Tester (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTPROMO with no assertion of notability - article about a method written by its creator and sourced entirely to his own articles. MSJapan (talk) 15:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- delete - part of Ergolight spam, also filed for deletion. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, it basically came in as a group on COIN, but some were prodded and removed, others were not, so there probably won't be a bundled nom. MSJapan (talk) 18:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:38, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- delete, Ergolight just got AFDed too - David Gerard (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.