Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GP Records (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. We have our G5. Thanks @Ingenuity: for saving us seven days. Star Mississippi 02:09, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GP Records

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a G4, but neither have any of the factors in the prior AfDs changed. Suggesting SALT if this closes as delete as it has been re-created by the same editor. Star Mississippi 01:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Indonesia. Star Mississippi 01:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Recreated article by (suspected) sock. The reference does not mention GP records at all it is about Universal Music taking over EMI. This in no way passes WP:NCOMPANY or WP:GNG. Delete and Salt. Hughesdarren (talk) 01:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note I have semi'ed the article so we don't play whack an IP for seven days. If someone has a better solution, feel free. Star Mississippi 01:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
and I've filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MFajarMardiansyah24032000 as the only one blocked is for DE so we're unfortunately not in G5 territory. Hopefully we will be for the next iteration. Star Mississippi 01:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.