Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GMD GF6C
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nominator has withdrawn request. Favonian (talk) 20:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- GMD GF6C (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article has no sources and no reliable sources could be found in news or Google search, prod has been removed by ip Rmzadeh ► 19:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Previous reference has been re-added. References do not need to be online.--Cube lurker (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Malformed AfD nomination (Missing the template tag, notification to the author of the article, etc.) In Addition Nominator appears to not have done WP:BEFORE. This leads me to think that this nomination is a attack regarding WuhWuzDat. Hasteur (talk) 19:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed template Rmzadeh ► 19:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as passing WP:V. Lots of these today. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:42, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw Request By Nominator Book reference have been added, as such i withdraw my request, please snowball. Thank you Rmzadeh ► 20:04, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.