Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fusion (student movement)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 16:51, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fusion (student movement)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obscure organization, founded by a non-notable leader of a non-notable group; unsourced and without credible assertions of notability. Orange Mike | Talk 21:34, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete For an article to be in this state after five years suggests there isn't much else to do with it. No independent sources. Notability not established.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 22:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep unfortunately this is only a stub. I think it was created to be a "house church" type movement for students. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have searched for reliable sources and have been unable to uncover any substantial reliable source coverage. This does not appear to pass notability requirements. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 17:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the AFD nomination was rather hurried after the article's restoration – see independent sources cited at WP:UNDELETE. I have now incorporated these briefly, although more information could be added from them. – Fayenatic (talk) 19:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Appears, judging by a quick spin around the Googleverse, that this is an international Methodist youth organization closely linked to large numbers of United Methodist Churches. I'm not going to dig for sources at this juncture, but bear in mind that this is a stub and there is adequate sourcing showing to meet a basic level of verification. Carrite (talk) 02:21, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as meeting WP:NONPROFIT. It is active in the US and UK, and was once active in Australia. The sources in the article are (just barely) enough to satisfy WP:NONPROFIT. -- 202.124.74.252 (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.