Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FuelCell Energy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:14, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FuelCell Energy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A CSD A7 was declined. No indication of significance or importance. Being a public traded company does not assert notability. Routine stock market reports, corporate listings, press releases, and primary sources. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG, and WP:ORGDEPTH. WP:NOTYELLOW.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:15, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: This article is one of around 62 mass produced from stock exchange listings. All either PRODed now, or those that have run their 7 days at AfD have been deleted. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:14, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If this is deleted, FuelCell Energy, Inc. should be deleted as well. While it is currently a redirect, it used to be an article about this topic. It was created by the same editor who created this article at about the same time, and there are few differences between the earliest edit of it and the early edits of this page. For reference, here is the initial edit and its final edit before it became a redirect. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a major company. 'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 20:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - in some industies, $250 million in capitalization would be big, but not in the energy sector. Bearian (talk) 20:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.