Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freight terminal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Vanamonde93 (talk) 23:26, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Freight terminal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a simple definition (with a dubious claim about most freight terminals being ports after saying that a loading dock is a kind of freight terminal). The articles linked to in this article seem like a sufficient coverage of the topic Gnisacc (talk) 17:36, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:08, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's a fairly generic term and the article is just a definition. Conversion to a list pointing to pages about different types of freight terminal could be a possible alternative to deletion if enough pages are written/available.
Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:32, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: What I see now is a DICDEF. There's no point keeping this. Oaktree b (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is nothing to add to this dictionary definition. Bearian (talk) 21:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An article could potentially be written on this subject, but what's there now is so useless it would be better to delete it and start over. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:40, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.