Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Neuropathology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:38, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Free Neuropathology

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article PRODed with reason "Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article creation too soon." Article dePRODed without reason given. See also this exchange on talk page of article creator. PROD reason still stands, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 16:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 16:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. See also Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals): it fails to meet the criteria suggested there.-- rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 17:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG easily, and NJournals. Not notable and not independently covered. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 22:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.