Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franz Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Inc.

Software company. Fails to establish notability, appears promotional. Artw (talk) 04:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete spam.--Bhockey10 (talk) 04:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

keep very non notable company for Lisp software history. --Checkmao (talk) 11:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please clarify - you're urging a "keep" while stating that the company is not notable. If the software history is the reason for keeping, you are advocating the maintaining of a WP:COATRACK. B.Wind (talk) 20:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't have a problem with the tone, and I wouldn't call it spam, but it does nothing to demonstrate notability. Unless we can see proof of coverage then it has to go. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Weak example of WP:CSD#A7 and WP:N. Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 01:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable Ucanlookitup (talk) 02:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - none of the sources are from a reliable third-party, leaving the article unreferenced and without assertion of notability. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 10:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If this had been in the AfC queue, it would have quickfailed without any reliable sources. Matt (talk) 03:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.