Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frame by Frame

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:05, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frame by Frame

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable song. Prod contested TEN DAYS after the fact, which is inexcusable. Opposing deprodders' suggestion to merge, as there are other uses of the phrase "frame by frame", including a whole dab page, and this does not appear to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Suggest deletion to move Frame by Frame (disambiguation) to this title. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 12:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

cc'd from the other dd we are both involved in:

"perhaps it went stale, because it was unsupported by the reviewing admins? please note that the passage of time on a prod does not create a "right" to deletion. it means only that no admin has chosen to fulfil your request."

as regards the case at hand, i do not understand why on earth you would opposed merging the info abt the song, into the article about the band? if the band itself is notable nough to merit coverage, then the band's work would seem to be a relevant part of said coverage...

as regards the dab, that's even more reason to keep a listing for Frame by Frame (song). THE WHOLE POINT of dab-pages is to enable readers to find what they are looking for (& to find out what-all shares the same name).

i have no problem with giving the dab precedence (i.e.: putting it up on Frame by Frame), but it's stupid to do that, & then eliminate one of the items for which a dab is needed.

Lx 121 (talk) 13:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable song. No indication it was a single or notable for any other reason in particular. Frame by Frame (disambiguation) should probably be moved there. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:31, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability is not inherited. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No assertion of notability. Mackensen (talk) 03:42, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and leave an entry for the song at Frame by Frame (disambiguation) pointing to Discipline (King Crimson album), so that anyone who may be searching for the song is directed appropriately. There is nothing worthwhile to be merged. --Michig (talk) 08:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. King Crimson (and prog rock in general) was never really my thing, but this song was apparently important enough for the band to name their 4-disc complilation after it. Getting focused search results is complicated because the song shares its name with the compilation, but I did find a few things that suggest that the song just might be borderline notable, or at least, worthy of substantive discussion in the album article. AllMusic has a separate article for the song, and calls it "a rapid-fire and densely orchestrated masterpiece " that "became an enthusiast favorite" and appears on multiple live recordings.[1] The song is also discussed in at least one book [2]. GNews results are mostly paywalled but the song is evidently mentioned repeatedly in concert reviews. --14:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Comment only. Frame by Frame is a great title for a 4-CD resumé of an artist's output? --Richhoncho (talk) 18:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per instructions suggested by Michig. Fails WP:NSONG. There's also a compilation album [3] by King Crimson with the same title. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.