Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortitude HTTP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Jake Wartenberg 03:01, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fortitude HTTP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable web server. I am unable to turn up any sources mentioning it outside of the official page. Delete. Horselover Frost (talk) 01:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete crystal. Self-sourced. Currently non-notable, who knows what the crystal ball might bring. Fifelfoo (talk) 01:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The Fortitude web server is available as a pre-release from the developers website and appears to have a fair feature set, the article itself is good in respect of content (no blatant advertising). However I could not find a single reference, not even from a download page like Softpedia or Brothersoft. The list of web servers links to more rather unknown web server articles. 83.254.210.47 (talk) 18:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 01:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not an index of software available as a pre-release from the developers webiste. Miami33139 (talk) 04:41, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:N, and WP:CRYSTAL. Ray^Talk 02:16, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Quite simply NN. JBsupreme (talk) 22:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.