Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forms.app (service)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Forms.app (service)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It does not seem to meet WP:ORGCRIT. MarioGom (talk) 07:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 07:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 07:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 07:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per norm. --Vaco98 (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete sources are basically listings and directories that is not enough Rlink2 (talk) 21:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose/Keep The sources are enough to show notability and do not consist of just listing but some third party reviews, as well. Currently, I am looking for ways to improve this article, any help appreciated. I can use help in some other pages (see the pages I want to create in my talk page). TheWirelessMonkey (talk) 10:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable enough. — Sean Brunnock (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 06:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to fail to meet our notability criteria. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:10, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, the reviews still do not amount to WP:SIGCOV. This is entirely non-notable at the present.Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 10:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.