Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forbes theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Forbes theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Looks like original research, nothing on Google --The Firewall 18:43, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Its not original research. I learned it in class today. Our teacher thinks it is defunct at low-level languages, but as a whole he says it stands to be true. --Lavernius (talk) 18:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It might be true, but unfortunately wikipedia articles need to be verifiable. :(
- You have enough time for research, consult your teacher, try to find some sources, even books will do. --The Firewall 19:02, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Its not original research. I learned it in class today. Our teacher thinks it is defunct at low-level languages, but as a whole he says it stands to be true. --Lavernius (talk) 18:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unless a verifiable reference can be found it is original research, Our teacher is not a reliable source. MilborneOne (talk) 19:04, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless those sources come forward. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:08, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete couldn't find the sources on google. I'm sure if it exists as you said then you could find perhaps some textbooks or something with the theory in it. Until then, delete. --Banime (talk) 20:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:NOTSOMETHINGYOURTEACHERMADEUPEITHER. / /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 00:33, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Big headache here is that the term "Forbes Theory" exists all over the net and refers to things totally unrelated to programming language. Better get those books from your professor. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:25, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - OR. AlexTiefling (talk) 15:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.