Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forbes Howie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Forbes Howie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. Not sufficiently notable 1sankaty (talk) 21:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I'd say that an obituary in The Scotsman and an entry is Scottish Who's who's is a high enough bar to cross to establish notability. I have to say, it does seem odd that a user's only contribution to Wikipedia is to nominate an article for deletion. The fact that another single-purpose user did a prod on this article citing a reason of WP:BIO makes me more suspicious. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 11:33, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Chris Neville-Smith. It needs some work, but it is a useful article on a man who was prominent in many different ways. It will probably need some non-internet sources. --Bduke (Discussion) 21:43, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per CNS and Bduke. All these brand new SPAs going after bios is very suspicious. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems like he's notable per sourcing above, although the article could indeed use some improvement. Vartanza (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep He met B-P and talked with him. 75.142.57.160 (talk) 16:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- Keep He met B-P and talked with him. 75.142.57.160 (talk) 16:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]