Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flow notation system

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flow notation system

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like one guy's private system, not used elsewhere. Not notable. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 02:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (for now, and with regret -- move to wikibooks). It does seem like this guy has invented something useful, and there's indication other rappers are using it. In a few years some hip college professor will write a book on rapping that will cover it, I hope, but for now it's just a new innovation with no RS independent of its inventor. Sorry. EEng (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. Could this go in a wikibook on music theory or something? I don't know what their standards are for inclusion.[reply]
Strong Delete per no RS, looks like a hoax Someone65 (talk) 20:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think it's a hoax? EEng (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't know if this is the way I'm supposed to edit this, but I'll try..it's Arightwizard (creator of the article) and I'm saying go ahead and delete it, I've decided if Tonedeff wants his system on any website other than his own (Which I would think is an RS, but I guess not since you guys don't, maybe I need more than one?), then he'll put it there himself. Arightwizard (talk) 00:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the message I left you at User_Talk:EEng about how you might be able to add it to Wikibooks. EEng (talk) 00:55, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.