Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flight Level Aviation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:07, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flight Level Aviation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability of this company is not established. According to the company's website, this is a single-aircraft flying school, which means it is even smaller than most typical flying schools, none of which have articles (or warrant them). YSSYguy (talk) 15:05, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm an inclusionist and belive a lot of things have Notability. But even I can't find a way to inclusionate this. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 15:35, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not appear to be notable article appears more promotional. MilborneOne (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Can't find any significant mentions in reliable sources. - EdoDodo ^talk 17:40, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: - Non-notable Spam. - Ahunt (talk) 22:35, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 02:14, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.